Minnesota SMS Marketing and A2P Messaging Rules

A plain-language, source-linked guide to Minnesota authorities relevant to SMS, MMS, telemarketing, privacy, consent, and do-not-call issues.

2reviewed source records

0express text-message sources

0fact-dependent sources

2related or unresolved sources

What the sources say

The Minnesota sources reviewed for this page do not expressly establish a general SMS or MMS rule. They are included because related telemarketing, do-not-call, privacy, or consumer-protection requirements may still matter to a messaging program.

Authorities and official sources

Each entry explains what the source says, where its limits are, and what it does not establish.

How this authority relates to messaging

This source is relevant to the broader program, but the reviewed text does not expressly establish general SMS or MMS coverage.

What the source establishes

Minnesota imposes adjacent privacy/data-use controls.

Limits and important context

AG enforcement.
Current 2025 statutory compilation displayed by the Revisor.
It is not a text-sending, telemarketing-consent, or DNC statute.

Official and supporting sources

§§ 325M.01–325M.09, ISP privacy

Source and review details

Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Source type: State law
Current status: Current

How this authority relates to messaging

This source is relevant to the broader program, but the reviewed text does not expressly establish general SMS or MMS coverage.

What the source establishes

Rights, transparency, consent for sensitive data, controller/processor duties, and complaint/enforcement workflows should already be in production if Minnesota residents are in scope.

Limits and important context

Minnesota AG resources identify the law, explain consumer rights, and note that the AG’s temporary warning-letter mechanism ended in early 2026. Material for nationwide messaging programs because Minnesota is now live and no longer in its initial warning-letter grace period. The especially important current-status point is that the AG’s temporary warning program ended January 31, 2026. Effective July 31, 2025. Strongest surfaced official source is the Minnesota AG privacy-law guidance. Effective July 31, 2025; the warning-letter period ended January 31, 2026.

Facts that may change the result

Does the organization fall within the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act?

Official and supporting sources

Source and review details

Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Source type: State law
Current status: Current

Continue with the most useful next step

Move from a jurisdiction or authority layer to the sources and tools most likely to answer the next question.

Check this state in the SMS Compliance Preflight Use program details to identify the authority layers that may apply. Federal law The federal statutes and regulations that form the national legal baseline for U.S. A2P text messaging. FCC rules and orders FCC actions addressing consent revocation, opt-out handling, robotext blocking, and related operational controls. Carrier policy Carrier policies and public guidance concerning approved messaging paths, consent evidence, opt-out handling, filtering, and sender behavior. Sender registration 10DLC, short-code, toll-free, vetting, and monitoring requirements used to register or verify U.S. A2P senders. National Do Not Call The national registry and federal do-not-call framework relevant to covered U.S. telemarketing programs. Browse SMS marketing laws by state Return to the complete state and national authority index.

Get a program-specific review

Use an advisory review when the result depends on facts that a public authority index cannot resolve.

See the advisory review